Developing season GNE-371 Data Sheet vegetation greenness was positively correlated PF-05105679 Purity & Documentation together

Developing season GNE-371 Data Sheet vegetation greenness was positively correlated PF-05105679 Purity & Documentation together with the increasing season precipitation,season vegetation greennessthe developing season temIn basic, the increasing and negatively correlated with was positively correlated with perature and vapor pressure deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation at the growing season precipitation, and negatively correlated with the developing season the two high-elevation stations correlate tiny with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, temperature and vapor stress deficit (Figure 7). The interannual dynamics of vegetation suggesting that aspects other than temperature and moisture control interannual vegetaat the two high-elevation stations correlate small with temperature, precipitation, or VPD, tion dynamics there. suggesting that factorsair temperature was negativelymoisture control interannual vegetation The growing season apart from temperature and correlated using the increasing seadynamics there. son vegetation greenness, and also the correlation coefficients have been statistically insignificant exceptThe developing on grassland. This suggestswas negatively correlatedvegetation growing at 1 station season air temperature that warming didn’t drive with the season vegetation greenness, and this area, and coefficients were statistically insignificant development in the interannual time scale inthe correlation inversely, vegetation growth could possibly have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) that warming did not drive vegetation except at one station on grassland. This suggests using the enhanced evapotranspiration from the interannual time scale within this region, and inversely, vegetation growth may possibly growth in the vegetation green-up. In addition, the magnitudes from the correlation among temperature and vegetation greenness had been commonly much smaller than these on the correlation in between humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics in this area could possibly be driven by soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is connected to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.4.4. Interannual Covariation in between the Vegetation Greenness and Climatic FactorsRemote Sens. 2021, 13,10 ofRemote Sens. 2021, 13,have cooled the near-surface air temperature (Figure S2) using the enhanced evapotranspiration from the vegetation green-up. In addition, the magnitudes from the correlation among temperature and vegetation greenness were generally significantly smaller than those of the correlation among humidity (i.e., precipitation and VPD) and vegetation greenness. This suggests that the interannual vegetation dynamics in this area could be driven by 11 of 20 soil moisture and atmospheric humidity–that is, precipitation and VPD, if we assume that precipitation is associated to soil moisture, and VPD represents air humidity.Figure 7. Correlation coefficients between the detrended developing season NDVI and also the detrended Figure 7. Correlation coefficients between the detrended expanding season NDVI along with the detrended expanding season temperature, precipitation, also as atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) growing season temperature, precipitation, too as atmospheric vapor stress deficit (VPD) at in the meteorological stations within the the period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI meteorological station the nine nine meteorological stations in period from 2000 to 2016. NDVI at aat a me.